Post a Comment
Share with a friend

January 21, 2010

Bucking Monogamy

Free-Loving Dissidents Buck Puritanism and Practice Polyamory


Thoroughly perforated by Puritanism, we Americans are quite sure that if something feels really, really good, it's probably very, very bad for you. Like shooting smack, watching porn on your boss's computer, or digging to the bottom of an order of Outback's Aussie Cheese Fries.

Love affairs are another example. In order to reap the toe-curling rewards of conventional romance — from the shivery intensity of new sex to the unparalleled peace of enduring intimacy — we must also abide the inevitable tedium of monogamy. We must accept and embrace the thrill-sapping sameness that yangs true love's yin.

Or must we?

A covey of free-thinking, free-loving dissidents is bucking Puritanism, bucking monogamy, and, frankly, bucking anyone else who's game. They practice what they call "polyamory," or being openly — and therefore ethically — involved in multiple intimate relationships.

"Poly," as it's called for short, encompasses all sorts of consciousness-expanding configurations: from stick-straight to gay-as-the-day-is-long, from married couples with separate-but-not-secret lovers to a trio of adoring roommates who share more than the water bill. It's not polygamy and it's not "swinging." It's consensual non-monogamy with as much emphasis on love as on sex.


123 Next >>

Comments


Whew...for a minute I thought you were talking about me...!

Tera Yahm

Mon Feb , 08:57:22


I always thought "polyamory" was that stuff you use to seal decks. I have been doing it all wrong. Thank you!

George

Mon Feb , 10:11:36


Rather "squarish" statements for someone born into and raised against a montage of "hip and cool", don't you think?

Jean

Tue Feb , 07:45:23


Post a Comment:

Name:
E-mail (will not be displayed):
Comment:
To help prevent spam, please re-enter the word that appears in pink below:

We reserve the right to edit or remove comments at our discretion.


<< Previous column View more columns Next column >>

Share this column with a friend

readers respond:

"Your column is the best part of the paper. I read it before I memorize the sports section. Please don't tell anyone, or they may revoke my gender privileges."


Scott Baldwin

*

Search:


*

Recent columns:

July 15, 2010
Mini-Cakes

July 8, 2010
Why Have Kids? No, Really.

July 1, 2010
Take This Ring and ...

June 24, 2010
I Ain't No Supermodel

June 17, 2010
Relationship Dissection

More >>


*

Most
E-mailed:

Home School

Breast Milk Canapé

Enough for Two

Book Club's Dramatic Chapter

Fall From Cool

More >>



The contents of this site are © Starshine Roshell.
All rights reserved. Site by Comicraft.